Is today's erratic weather caused by Global Warming? So says the IPCC, the UN body in charge of climate change investigations. Nevertheless, numerous scientists have disputed the UN reports. But recently the theft of a massive number of private emails from individuals such as the UAE's Phil Jones have put that conclusion in doubt.

Skeptics Claim Stolen Emails Prove Global Warming a Hoax
November 20, 2009
http://rawstory.com/2009/11/skeptics-claim-stolen-emails-prove-global-warming-hoax/

According to a more sober account of the theft offered by the Guardian, the stolen files were first uploaded on to a Russian server, before being widely mirrored across the internet. The University of East Anglia has confirmed that files were stolen from its server but has not verified the genuineness of the allegedly random selection of material that has been released. The scientists involved have also refused to comment on the record, although they insist privately that the e-mails are being taken out of context.

UN Scientists Turn on Each Other
November 28, 2009
http://climatedepot.com/a/4100/

Scientists who disagreed with the UN IPCC climate view were bullied and subtly blackmailed. Since the email and data scandal dubbed "ClimateGate" broke earlier this month, scientists from around the world now are questioning the propriety of a UN climate conference.

Is this a surprise? Not to ZetaTalk fans, who have known all along that Global Warming was just a ruse, a cover for the Earth changes anticipated to be caused by Planet X.

ZetaTalk Prediction 7/15/1995: All attempts to explain the changes based on Global Warming from the greenhouse effect will run into snags as the weather will refuse to be predictable. A key change, to which one could point, is the warming of the Earth's oceans, around the globe. This has been measured as a 6 inch rise, worldwide, on all the beaches. The waters have risen because they are warmer, and warm water takes up more room than cold water, as all elementary physics books will report. How is it that the oceans, so very deep and so very cold, have warmed up? Is it the almost imperceptible rise in the temperature of the air, a degree or so, as reported to date? Since heat rises, why would this slight rise affect the oceans? Meteorologists will tell you that the effect of air warming is air turbulence, not warmer oceans.

ZetaTalk Prediction 6/15/1996: The weather is blamed on Global Warming, the greenhouse effect, which in and of itself might be an explanation that would hold if weather were the only symptom. It is the heat from the core of the earth and the increased earthquake and volcanic activity that boggles these attempts at alternative explanations.

ZetaTalk Prediction 7/15/1997: The increasing activity in the core of the Earth will eventually manifest itself in ways that will become difficult to explain. Erratic weather will continue to be explained away as Global Warming, the result of the atmosphere heating up to cause swirls in the upper atmosphere.

Scientists objecting to the conclusions forced by the UN body, the IPCC, were silenced, shushed, and ignored or punished. Yet the Global Warming explanation has been challenged by many scientists over the years, who found the facts not fitting with the Global Warming models.

Global Warming Facts, Consensus Melt Away
October 1, 2001
../theword/tworx422.htm

The exaggeration over the supposed scientific consensus on the human cause of global warming continues, even as the evidence that the underlying data supposedly proving a human connection melts away. There is stronger evidence that it is not mankind that has caused global warming.

 

Prominent French Scientist Reverses Belief in Global Warming - Now a Skeptic
March 02, 2007
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/story.html?

In the 1980s and early 1990s, when concern about global warming was in its infancy, little was known about the mechanics of how it could occur, or the consequences that could befall us. Since then, governments throughout the western world and bodies such as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have commissioned billions of dollars worth of research by thousands of scientists. With a wealth of data now in, Dr. Allegre has recanted his views. To his surprise, the many climate models and studies failed dismally in establishing a man-made cause of catastrophic global warming.

And even up to the date of the ClimateGate scandal breaking, the public was given conflicting information about Global Warming.

Statisticians Reject Global Cooling
October 26, 2009
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091026/ap_on_bi_ge/us_sci_global_cooling

Have you heard that the world is now cooling instead of warming? You may have seen some news reports on the Internet or heard about it from a provocative new book. Only one problem: It's not true, according to an analysis of the numbers done by several independent statisticians for The Associated Press. Of the 10 hottest years recorded by NOAA, eight have occurred since 2000, and after this year it will be nine because this year is on track to be the sixth-warmest on record.

 

November 19, 2009
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,662092,00.html

Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.

Al Gore's Role

Who will be the winners and losers during ClimateGate? Certainly those scientists trying to object to a UN conclusion averse the facts were the losers in the past, though they have now been exonerated. But didn't Al Gore put his good name on the line on this matter? Al Gore, who won the Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar for his documentary, An Inconvenient Truth.

ZetaTalk Comment 11/28/2009: Global Warming, as we have long stated, is not the cause of the current Earth changes, but is rather a cover chosen to explain many of the anticipated Earth changes. All was well as long as the media and the supposed scientific consensus made the statement that Global Warming was evident and undeniable. Since most people in power in the establishment are aware that there is a presence in our inner solar system likely to pass at some point, and since the establishment has the opinion that panic in the masses is the thing to fear, they pressed all those under their control to go along with this cover-up story. It is no secret that under Bush, scientists were told what to say, ordered to toe the line. The media is controlled. Al Gore went forward like a sacrificial goat to tout the line, knowing that eventually he would be shamed for this. Now that a leak has been accomplished, those in charge of the cover-up are stunned and not sure how to proceed. Their first approach is to see what the fallout might be, if excuses can suffice.

The Zetas have been frequently asked about Gore's position on Global Warming, as the Zetas consistently made their opinions on the matter known. If Gore is one of the good guys, what's he doing in a lie? During the Bush administration, the Zetas pointed out that Gore was under a national security oath on the matter, so could not speak out, and that Gore's early forays on the matter were more in line with putting himself forward as a future office holder, a politician.

Question: Gore who is apparently Service-to-Other, won't come out and say that Planet X is coming despite his inside knowledge, but just goes on about Global Warming. Telling the public about Global Warming is not a substitute for the truth. Will common people make the distinction?

ZetaTalk Answer 4/7/2007: We have stated that Gore's movie, An Inconvenient Truth, was intended to posture Gore in the limelight more than correct carbon emissions. The movie was about Gore, more than about Global Warming, as it discussed his childhood, family tragedies, and the theft of the 2000 presidential election. In that Bush has declared talking about Planet X, by those officially in the know, to be a national security breech, Gore can hardly be held accountable for the lack of a pronouncement from his lips. The media is likewise put in this position. Gore would be imprisoned if he talked, as he learned his facts about Planet X from NASA and his stint in the White House. By law he could be prosecuted, and would be prosecuted, though this would be dealt with as an insanity issue, not a legal matter.

ZetaTalk Comment 10/27/2007: Gore has a delicate balance to maintain. He has mapped out his path, to be prepared to assume leadership in a heartbeat if the situation calls for it, or to jump into the 2008 campaign if Hillary Clinton falters due to the many skeletons in her closet coming to light. His efforts on the Global Warming issue, as we have explained, are to posture him in the public eye as something other than the wooden candidate he was in 2000, stiff and shy, to being someone internationally known and respected, applauded, and at ease in the spotlight. At this he has succeeded.

But Gore is still silenced, apparently, as Alex Jones of Prison Planet reports.

Al Gore Confronted on ClimateGate in Chicago
November 30, 2009
http://www.prisonplanet.com/al-gore-confronted-on-climategate-in-chicago.html

By the look on his face and his stutter, it became quite clear that Gore was extremely uncomfortable with the question, so he quickly glared towards his security. The agents grabbed and assaulted Saad, escorting him away from Gore for merely asking a simple question. The press took notice and started filming and snapping pictures of what was going on. One of which appeared the next day in the Chicago Sun Times. A little while later, Anthony, an activist, approached Gore and handed him the petition of the 31,486 scientists who say that Global Warming is a complete hoax. Mr. Gore rolled his eyes, and security escorted him out of the building.

Gore cannot defend himself unless the subject of Planet X were allowed to be discussed, officially. At present, it looks like Al Gore is to be a scapegoat. Even under Obama, the cover-up is alive and well.

ZetaTalk Comment 5/30/2009: Those who try to justify the coverup are doing so partially on the basis that the public would panic and more harm would come because of this than if the public had no warning until the last weeks. This is not fact, but their need to forgive themselves for what they are doing to the populace. The average person would simply continue in their job, as they are living paycheck to paycheck. They would take the warning and hope for the best, or perhaps make contingency plans, a route to safety, for instance. Those that could make firmer plans would do so, but would be unlikely to disrupt their comfortable lives until the rumors or warnings proved true, until the last weeks. The only group that could quit their lives and devote themselves to preparing are the wealthy, and this group is already taking these steps. A government fear that is likely to arise are demands from those who are reliant upon the government - those on welfare, those retired and reliant on pensions or social security checks. These individuals would make demands upon the government which the government could not address. It is not possible for the population to be protected and rescued and fed and sheltered during such a clammily. This is the honest answer which the government would not want to be pressed to admit.

Internet Future

As an almost unstopable means of spreading truth, like water leaking through the fingers of dictators and despots, the Internet is a threat to the establishment. The recent release of Global Warming emails, showing that the Global Warming threat claimed by the UN body, the IPCC, is a fraud, is a case in point. Major media - TV, radio, and the printed press - have been silent on the matter, but the Internet throbs with discussion. Given that the cover-up over the presence of Planet X is increasingly difficult to maintain, is the Internet itself under threat? Despite an executive order allowing Obama to control that part of the Internet under US jurisdiction in the case of a terrorist threat, all is alive and well. The Internet, in fact, is moving away from strict US control.

US Relinquishes Control of the Internet
September 30, 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/sep/30/icann-agreement-us

After complaints about American dominance of the internet and growing disquiet in some parts of the world, Washington has said it will relinquish some control over the way the network is run and allow foreign governments more of a say in the future of the system. ICANN - the official body that ultimately controls the development of the internet thanks to its oversight of web addresses such as .com, .net and .org - said today that it was ending its agreement with the US government. The deal, part of a contract negotiated with the US department of commerce, effectively pushes California-based ICANN towards a new status as an international body with greater representation from companies and governments around the globe. ICANN had previously been operating under the auspices of the American government, which had control of the net thanks to its initial role in developing the underlying technologies used for connecting computers together.

 

Internet Inches Closer to 'Internationalisation'
November 16, 2009
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has opened the application process, ending the exclusive use of Latin characters for website addresses. With the introduction of "internationalised" domain names (IDNs), scripts such as Chinese, Korean or Arabic will eventually be usable in the last part of an address name - the part after the dot, as in .com and .org.

Physically, the Internet is maintained on servers placed all over the world, and these certainly are not owned by the US or any single entity. By design, information spent out over the Internet has MANY routes to its destination. If one route is blocked, another is tried. Like water flowing through and over the ground, it would be almost impossible to stop.


SOURCE: Visual Complexity

Some repressive countries, like China and Saudi Arabia, have gateways where all Internet traffic to and from the country must flow. In these cases, the country can ban certain websites, though such bans can be evaded. Nonetheless, heavy handed attempts to control access to the Internet have show up recently. For one, an attempt by access providers to block certain traffic, challenging the open internet rule.

FCC Commissioners Support Open Internet Rule
October 22, 2009
http://www.reuters.com/article/regulatoryNewsConsumerGoodsAndRetail/

U.S. communications regulators voted unanimously to support an open Internet rule that would prevent telecom network operators from barring or blocking content based on the revenue it generates. The proposed rule now goes to the public for comment until Jan. 14, after which the Federal Communications Commissions will review the feedback and possibly seek more comment. A final rule is not expected until the spring of next year. The vote came despite a flurry of lobbying against the net neutrality rule by telecommunications service providers like AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc and Qwest Communications International Inc, which say it would strip them of the ability to manage their networks effectively and would stifle innovation and competition. The rule would prevent operators from discriminating against any legal content a third party wants to deliver to consumers on their networks, though it allows for "reasonable" network management to unclog congestion, clear viruses and spam, and block unlawful content like child pornography or the transfer of pirated content.

Another challenge is Murdoch's attempt to prevent his printed press material from being quoted on the Internet.

Twitter Chief Tells Murdoch: Internet Paywall Will Not Work
November 19, 2009
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/nov/19/twitter-murdoch-paywall-charge-content

In recent weeks Murdoch has launched a vitriolic attack on Google and other web companies, accusing them of "stealing" content created by his titles, including the Times and the Sun. Management at News International is working on plans to introduce an online paywall next spring and prevent stories from being linked to by sites such as Google News.

Will any of this work? No, per the Zetas.

ZetaTalk Prediction 9/5/2009: The Internet is not so much hated as feared by the establishment. It has become a tool of commerce and business, as well as government functions, and thus cannot simply be shut down without a horrific impact on the economy. This would be akin to martial law, and not be sustainable. Thus, they are stuck with the Internet which disseminates information almost instantly, going viral as the saying goes. They have countered the information that is a threat to their control by disseminating disinformation, but this practice has been recognized and is easily identified by the common man. Only those highly gullible and easily lead are fooled by disinformation.

You received this Newsletter because you Subscribed to the ZetaTalk Newsletter service. If undesired, you can quickly Unsubscribe.